Friday, February 10, 2006

What Does the Malcom Gladwell Phenomenon Reveal About Our Culture?


How did Gladwell become the Dale Carnegie of the iPod Generation?

Last night I was wondering why the author Malcom Gladwell could become such a cultural prodigy. Better yet, I began asking myself the much more incisive question: What does the Gladwell effect say about our culture?

It says times have changed. The way we learn is different. The way we see and receive information is different. We’re searching for understanding, for something else, yet with reasons. What most people care about is fulfilling experiences, fulfilling relationships and reasonable understanding. Gladwell helps in the latter. We know we’re becoming more and more complex but we’re more than willing to allow it as long we enjoy life and relationships. This reveals a lot more than most of us take the time to consider, or have allow ourselves such time.

As most of us know, Malcom Gladwell is the acclaimed author of the hugely bestsellers "Blink" and "The Tipping Point”—so big it created an unexpected wave of non-fiction books to seize the market, the kind that none of us could be have predicted to become such a bestseller in the mainstream pop culture. But it’s not the sales that perplex me – it’s the impact it’s having on the entire culture. I've wondered what this could mean. What could this say about us? At first, his popularity and influence on our culture seemed strange to me, that is until I began a two-year journey seeking understanding of the culture and why the gospel stopped sticking.

This week I read a well-written article on Gladwell by the New York Times book review editor Rachel Donadio. Danadio made these elucidating observations, comparing Gladwell’s impact to Dale Carnegie ("How to Win Friends and Influence People" - 1936) and Norman Vincet Peale ("Power of Positive Thinking" - 1952), who's books helped shaped society in a peculiar way.

In our "iPod generation" we've chosen Malcom Gladwell. While Carnegie and Peale produced books about understanding, relating and liking people, Gladwell helps us understand how things work in a way that helps us have control over them. What Danadio calls optimism through demystification. While optimism will always be a foremost way to win in society, certainly – a vital asset to all - but, it's demystication that we most desire today.

What does this say to the person who is trying to add value to culture? It’s clear that people think differently – way differently than they did 30, 20, 10, even 5 years ago.

The biggest thing that I have to keep driving home to people and organizations is how vitally important it is for you to "think deeply" about what you do and why you do it. Not only in a linear approach but in non-linear, right-brained one. And then to work hard at communicating that to the everyday world, and make sure it’s transferable and memorable (Gladwell’s Stickiness Factor). This world intensely desires to have an "under the surface" understanding of life, and especially faith.

Gladwell is doing the work most people wish they could do. To think, write, converse and read all day in coffee shop’s. I don't argue with that life because that's the gist of my days - fortunately. So we have joined this guy’s journey of questions and desire for understanding through his writings, as he thinks deeply about the issues affecting our lives and culture. So he's become our friend. He’s become one of our life tour guide’s. And all of us should be aware that this is the way many of the leaders in the 21st century will look.

He’ll have a message, but he’ll carry it with deep-seated "reasons." He’s open. He thinks. He wonders. He sees new horizons. And the world becomes his audience.

He isn’t afraid of the complex, the unpredictable, the unknown. Rather he enjoys the process of finding answers while embracing the mystical. He is used to speed, to change and to options so he just goes with it, until he find what fits. He’d rather have mobility than stability any day. There will be a tension between opportunity and loyalty in his life. Leaders who follow Jesus will respond to that by being careful what they commit to, trusting the spirit to synch their heart with Jesus' in every situation. There will be tension between short-term and long-term because many leaders see long-term commitment has a threat to their freedom and personalization. Again, leaders who follow Jesus will have to hack that one out with the Heavenly Father. The leader of the future loves challenges and will have a hard time with commitment. They don't want to be loyalist just for the sake of loyalty - like their parents were taught and lived. Tomorrow’s leaders don’t necessarily want to change the world; they’d rather enjoy the world while changing it. He loves to rethink everything – another reason to welcome the Malcom Gladwell’s of the world, if only there were more. There are, just wait and see. In fact, the self-proclaimed liberal Gladwell is called a Spiritual leader of the American culture, which is scary.

I have asked myself constantly these sorts of questions the past couple years:
Questions of Purpose and Perspective : :
• Am I on this earth to fit my heart, passion and gifts into a system that seemed to work in the past? Am I on this earth to be a missionary to the real world or the church world?
Questions of Willingness and Aloneness : :
• Am I willing to do what God has called me to do even if I have to do it alone? Am I willing to pay the price for their souls? Am I willing to listen to the Spirit and explore the unknown or just do what people tell me to do?

I am becoming clearly convinced that most of us (if 40 yrs & below) are not meant to continue serving in the methods of the past. What we are meant to do is whatever it takes to lead this generation into the discovery of Jesus. And if the leaders older than us do not understand how to release us to reach our generations, then we have to be strong and courageous to make a new path without them. This isn’t about our parents or about us; it’s about destiny and people souls.

3 Comments:

At 11:42 PM, Blogger shane miller said...

Yo Bry! I like reading your stuff because I know it will always make me think. I did want to leave a comment that I'm sure we will talk about more later.

When you talk about what the 21st Century leader will look like, why do you say he will value "Opportunity over loyalty" and "He loves challenges and resists commitment?"

This just does not seem to be desirable leadership traits. As we know a leader is a person people follow. So if a 21st century leader gathers and organizes people around him for a certain goal or mission and then an other "opportunity" comes his way he is just going to check out and abandon his followers because he "loves challenges" and "resists commitment?"

That certainly is not the leadership advice Paul gave to young Timothy and Titus who were pastering church plants in a very hard, "un-churched" neighborhood. I'm sure these guys would have loved to take an opportunity to go pastor a thriving church in an affluent "churched" region. Paul told them to remain faithful to their calling, fight the good fight, and to keep working hard. But I guess that was just works for the 1st century Leaders.

You also say that 21st century leaders "will leave Short-term over long-term." What does that mean? Does that mean if a leader is not seeing any results he is to abandon the project and take the next opportunity? If so, what does that tell a guy planting a church in the North East? First of all anyone who plants a church in the American NE are certainly optimistic and ambitious. The likelihood of this guy seeing immediate "short-term" results in minuscule. So it would seem some long-term commitment would be needed to see long-term results.

So anyway just wanted to hear you expound on some of these. Love ya Bro!

 
At 4:58 PM, Blogger drewbenton said...

Very well said my friend.

 
At 11:34 PM, Blogger Bryan Davidson said...

Shane,

I certainly did a poor job at communicating what I was trying to say. So I edited it.

Your great mind picked up on the obvious holes I left wide open and should have known better. This is one of the downsizes with blogging. I don’t want to think too hard in all my posts, which is laziness. Btw, I love your remarks here. I am so grateful to have friends who take the time to read and respond to me. That means a lot.

Okay, when I said the 21st century leader will value “opp over loyalty” and “he loves challenges and resists commitment” and short-term over long-term” in my mind I was referring to the big picture perspective of what most of them value. What I messed up on was differentiating what is biblical and cultural. I edited my remarks. Thanks for catching that bro.

What I meant by the short-term over long-term thought was that long-term commitments scare them. That comes from seeing their parents value the traditional values but these people don’t give much a flip about that. Their parents gen made them this way. Barna talks about this a lot. All in all, this means the next gen leader won’t make a quick decision on long-term stuff and we shouldn’t let them either because they aren’t afraid to jump ship, which we know is unbiblical. I agree that long-term commitments are critical. These leaders will be varied in what they do. Very few will focus on one thing and I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing – probably not a wise thing, but they’re pretty good at balancing all the stuff in this world. Remember, their parents gen gave them all of this and this is just how their responding.

B.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from freestats.com